4.7 Article

Applying nutrient dynamics to adjust the nutrient-water balance in hydroponic crops. A case study with open hydroponic tomato crops from Barcelona

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 261, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108908

Keywords

Fertigation; Phosphorus; Nutrient budget; Industrial ecology; Substance flow analysis; Substrate

Categories

Funding

  1. Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CTM2013-47067-C2-1-R, CTM2016-75772-C3-1-R, MDM-2015-0552]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Global food production systems generate impacts such as eutrophication, caused by nutrient run-off from agricultural exploitations and exacerbated by climate change. Hydroponic cultivation methods are common in Mediterranean areas, although there is a gap in the literature with regard to their study. This study aims to fill that gap, by assessing nutrient flows in hydroponic crops. Results: The results showed that most of the nutrients were drained with the leachates (51% on average), a figure which could be lower, if the nutrient supply were adjusted to the needs of the plants or if (closed hydroponic) nutrient recirculation were implemented, without compromising the nutrient uptake of the plant. Moreover, the study revealed that a significant quantity of nutrients was retained in the substrate (perlite) during the crop, reaching average values of 5% of incoming calcium, 6% of nitrogen, and 7% of phosphorus. In the case of phosphorus and calcium, a regression model is presented for the estimation of their retention in hydroponic crops. Conclusions: Although further studies will be needed to confirm the above trends, the study makes a significant contribution to understanding the metabolism of nutrients in hydroponic crops and to finer adjustments of the nutrient balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available