4.5 Article

Blocking EGFR palmitoylation suppresses PI3K signaling and mutant KRAS lung tumorigenesis

Journal

SCIENCE SIGNALING
Volume 13, Issue 621, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aax2364

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA181633]
  2. ACS [RSG-15-027-01]
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often characterized by mutually exclusive mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or the guanosine triphosphatase KRAS. We hypothesized that blocking EGFR palmitoylation, previously shown to inhibit EGFR activity, might alter downstream signaling in the KRAS-mutant setting. Here, we found that blocking EGFR palmitoylation, by either knocking down the palmitoyltransferase DHHC20 or expressing a palmitoylation-resistant EGFR mutant, reduced activation of the kinase PI3K, the abundance of the transcription factor MYC, and the proliferation of cells in culture, as well as reduced tumor growth in a mouse model of KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Knocking down DHHC20 reduced the growth of existing tumors derived from human KRAS-mutant lung cancer cells and increased the sensitivity of these cells to a PI3K inhibitor. Palmitoylated EGFR interacted with the PI3K regulatory subunit PIK3R1 (p85) and increased the recruitment of the PI3K heterodimer to the plasma membrane. Alternatively, blocking palmitoylation increased the association of EGFR with the MAPK adaptor Grb2 and decreased that with p85. This binary switching between MAPK and PI3K signaling, modulated by EGFR palmitoylation, was only observed in the presence of oncogenic KRAS. These findings suggest a mechanism whereby oncogenic KRAS saturates signaling through unpalmitoylated EGFR, reducing formation of the PI3K signaling complex. Future development of DHHC20 inhibitors to reduce EGFR-PI3K signaling could be beneficial to patients with KRAS-mutant tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available