4.7 Article

Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 μm) during drinking water treatment

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 720, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137383

Keywords

Micro-and nanoplastics; Water treatment; Coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation; Filtration; Biofilm

Funding

  1. WSU Center for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors [NIEHS P30 ES020957]
  2. Great Lakes Protection Fund (GLPF) [1151]
  3. Richard Barber Interdisciplinary Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 mu m) during drinking water treatment, particularly coagulation/flocculation combined with sedimentation (CFS) and granular filtration under ordinary working conditions at water treatment plants (WTPs). It also studied the interactions between biofilms and microplastics and the consequential impact on treatment efficiency. Generally, CFS was not sufficient to remove micro- and nanoplastics. The sedimentation rate of clean plastics was lower than 2.0% for all different sizes of plastic particles with coagulant Al-2(SO4)(3). Even with the addition of coagulant aid (PolyDADMAC), the highest removal was only 13.6% for 45-53 mu m of particles. In contrast, granular filtration was much more effective at filtering out micro- and nanoplastics, from 86.9% to nearly complete removal (99.9% for particles larger than 100 mu m). However, there existed a critical size (10-20 mu m) where a significant lower removal (86.9%) was observed. Biofilms were easily formed on microplastics. In addition, biofilm formation significantly increased the removal efficiency of CFS treatment from <2.0% to 16.5%. This work provides new knowledge to better understand the fate and transport of emerging micro- and nanoplastic pollutants during drinking water treatment, which is of increasing concern due to the potential human exposure to micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available