Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 709, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136075
Keywords
Streambed sampling; Samplers; Nutrients; Nitrate; Ammonium
Categories
Funding
- Leverhulme Trust
- NERC through a Central England NERC Training Alliance Studentship
- NERC [NE/L004437/1]
- European Union's H2020-MSCA-RISE-2016 project [734317]
- US NSF Award [1446328]
- NERC [NE/I016120/1, NE/I016120/2, NE/L004437/1, NE/P003486/1, NE/L003872/1, NE/R014752/1, bgs06003] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Biogeochemical gradients in streambeds are steep and can vary over short distances often making adequate characterisation of sediment biogeochemical processes challenging. This paper provides an overview and comparison of streambed pore-water sampling methods, highlighting their capacity to address gaps in our understanding of streambed biogeochemical processes. This work reviews and critiques available pore-water sampling techniques to characterise streambed biogeochemical conditions, including their characteristic spatial and temporal resolutions, and associated advantages and limitations. A field study comparing three commonly-used pore-water sampling techniques (multilevel mini-piezometers, miniature drivepoint samplers and diffusive equilibrium in thin-film gels) was conducted to assess differences in observed nitrate and ammonium concentration profiles. Pore-water nitrate concentrations did not differ significantly between sampling methods (p-value = 0.54) with mean concentrations of 2.53, 4.08 and 4.02 mg l(-1) observed with the multilevel mini-piezometers, miniature drivepoint samplers and diffusive equilibrium in thin-film gel samplers, respectively. Pore-water ammonium concentrations, however, were significantly higher in pore-water extracted by multilevel mini-piezometers (3.83 mg l(-1)) and significantly lower where sampled with miniature drivepoint samplers (1.05 mg l(-1), p-values<0.01). Differences in observed pore-water ammonium concentration profiles between active (suction: multilevel mini-piezometers) and passive (equilibrium; diffusive equilibrium in thin-film gels) samplers were further explored under laboratory conditions. Measured pore-water ammonium concentrations were significantly greater when sampled by diffusive equilibrium in thin-film gels than with multilevel mini-piezometers (all p-values <= 0.02). The findings of this study have critical implications for the interpretation of field-based research on hyporheic zone biogeochemical cycling and highlight the need for more systematic testing of sampling protocols. For the first time, the impact of different active and passive pore-water sampling methods is addressed systematically here, highlighting to what degree the choice of pore-water sampling methods affects research outcomes, with relevance for the interpretation of previously published work as well as future studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available