4.5 Review

The promising alliance of anti-cancer electrochemotherapy with immunotherapy

Journal

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 165-177

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-016-9615-3

Keywords

Electrochemotherapy; Electrogenetherapy; Immunotherapy; Cancer; Metastasis; Immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. University of Paris-Sud, Gustave Roussy
  3. Fondation Electricite De France
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (MEMOVE project)
  5. Institut Thematique Multi-Organismes Cancer [PC201517]
  6. Departement du Val-de-Marne through the TELVAC project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anti-tumor electrochemotherapy, which consists in increasing anti-cancer drug uptake by means of electroporation, is now implanted in about 140 cancer treatment centers in Europe. Its use is supported by the English National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for the palliative treatment of skin metastases, and about 13,000 cancer patients were treated by this technology by the end of 2015. Efforts are now focused on turning this local anti-tumor treatment into a systemic one. Electrogenetherapy, that is the electroporation-mediated transfer of therapeutic genes, is currently under clinical evaluation and has brought excitement to enlarge the anti-cancer armamentarium. Among the promising electrogenetherapy strategies, DNA vaccination and cytokine-based immunotherapy aim at stimulating anti-tumor immunity. We review here the interests and state of development of both electrochemotherapy and electrogenetherapy. We then emphasize the potent beneficial outcome of the combination of electrochemotherapy with immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or strategies based on electrogenetherapy, to simultaneously achieve excellent local debulking anti-tumor responses and systemic anti-metastatic effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available