4.7 Article

Simultaneous removal of mixed contaminants triclosan and copper by green synthesized bimetallic iron/nickel nanoparticles

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 695, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133878

Keywords

Triclosan; Cu (II); Fe/Ni nanoparticles; Adsorption; Degradation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mixed contamination of environmental matrices by antibacterial agents and heavy metals has attracted much attention worldwide due to the complex nature of their environmental interactions and their potential toxicity. In this work, green synthesized bimetallic iron nickel nanoparticles (Fe/Ni NPs) was used to simultaneously remove triclosan (TCS) and copper (Cu (II)) under optimal experimental conditions with removal efficiencies of 75.8 and 44.1% respectively. However, in a mixed contaminant system the removal efficiencies of TCS and Cu (II) were lower than when TCS (85.8%) and Cu (II) (52.5%) were removed separately, suggesting that there was competitive relationship between the two contaminants and Fe Ni NPs used for remediation. SEM-EDS, XRD and MR all indicated that both TCS and Cu (II) were adsorbed onto Fe/Ni NPs. Furthermore, while XPS showed that Cu (II) was reduced to Cu, GC -MS analysis showed that TCS also underwent degradation with 2,7/2,S-C12DD as the major intermediate. The adsorption of both contaminants fit well a pseudo second order kinetic model (R-2 0.998) and the Freundlich isotherm (R-2 > 0.905). Whereas the reduction kinetics obeyed a pseudo first order model. Thus, overall the removal of TCS and Cu (II) involved a combination of both adsorption and reduction. Finally, a removal mechanism for triclosan and Cu (II) was proposed. Overall, Fe/Ni NPs have the potential to practically coinstantaneously remove both TCS and Cu (II) from aqueous solution under a wide range of conditions. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available