Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions
Kimberly S. Wolske et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2019)
Is There Any Hope? How Climate Change News Imagery and Text Influence Audience Emotions and Support for Climate Mitigation Policies
Lauren Feldman et al.
RISK ANALYSIS (2018)
Perceptions of climate engineering in the South Pacific, Sub-Saharan Africa, and North American Arctic
Wylie A. Carr et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2018)
Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks
Jessica Strefler et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Negative emissions-Part 3: Innovation and upscaling
Gregory F. Nemet et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Negative emissions-Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
Sabine Fuss et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Negative emissions-Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis
Jan C. Minx et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Developing countries must lead on solar geoengineering research
A. Atiq Rahman et al.
NATURE (2018)
Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies
Detlef P. van Vuuren et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2018)
Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination
Christopher H. Trisos et al.
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2018)
Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic eruptions
Jonathan Proctor et al.
NATURE (2018)
Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals
Mark G. Lawrence et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2018)
Global energy growth is outpacing decarbonization
R. B. Jackson et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Exploring public perception of environmental technology over time
Carola Braun et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT (2018)
Geoengineering at the Edge of the World: Exploring perceptions of ocean fertilisation through the Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation
Kate Elizabeth Gannon et al.
GEO-GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENT (2018)
Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence
Carola Braun et al.
CLIMATE POLICY (2018)
Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power
Bernadette Sutterlin et al.
ENERGY POLICY (2017)
Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS
Carola Braun
RISK ANALYSIS (2017)
The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
Christine Merk et al.
RISK ANALYSIS (2017)
Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal
Christopher B. Field et al.
SCIENCE (2017)
Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency
Anthony C. Jones et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2017)
Public perception of solar radiation management: the impact of information and evoked affect
Bernadette Sutterlin et al.
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH (2017)
Making sense of climate engineering: a focus group study of lay publics in four countries
Victoria Wibeck et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2017)
The influence of learning about carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on support for mitigation policies
Victoria Campbell-Arvai et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2017)
Beliefs and values explain international differences in perception of solar radiation management: insights from a cross-country survey
Vivianne H. M. Visschers et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2017)
Perceptions of enhanced weathering as a biological negative emissions option
Nick F. Pidgeon et al.
BIOLOGY LETTERS (2017)
Public perceptions of climate geoengineering: a systematic review of the literature
Christopher L. Cummings et al.
CLIMATE RESEARCH (2017)
Knowledge about aerosol injection does not reduce individual mitigation efforts
Christine Merk et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2016)
Using decision pathway surveys to inform climate engineering policy choices
Robin Gregory et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2016)
What do people think when they think about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research
Elizabeth T. Burns et al.
EARTHS FUTURE (2016)
Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists 'open up' appraisal of geoengineering
Rob Bellamy et al.
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2016)
Exploring public perceptions of stratospheric sulfate injection
Christine Merk et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2015)
Public Perception of Climate Change: The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews
Jing Shi et al.
RISK ANALYSIS (2015)
Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering
Adam Corner et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2015)
Laypeople's Risky Decisions in the Climate Change Context: Climate Engineering as a Risk-Defusing Strategy?
Dorothee Amelung et al.
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT (2015)
From 'Go Slow' to 'Gung Ho'? Climate Engineering Discourses in the UK, the US, and Germany
Sebastian Harnisch et al.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS (2015)
Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization: Testing a Two-Channel Model of Science Communication
Dan M. Kahan et al.
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (2015)
Public Perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate
Dirk Scheer et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2014)
Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the 'moral hazard' argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions
Adam Corner et al.
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES (2014)
A quantitative evaluation of the public response to climate engineering
Malcolm J. Wright et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2014)
The Role of Initial Affective Impressions in Responses to Educational Communications: The Case of Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS)
Waendi Bruine de Bruin et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED (2014)
Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK
Adam Corner et al.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2013)
Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project
Nick Pidgeon et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2013)
Consumers' knowledge about climate change
Christina Tobler et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2012)
Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: International survey findings
Ann Bostrom et al.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2012)
Exploring early public responses to geoengineering
Nick Pidgeon et al.
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES (2012)
Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework
N. M. A. Huijts et al.
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS (2012)
A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud
Andy Jones et al.
ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS (2011)
Public understanding of solar radiation management
A. M. Mercer et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2011)
Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise
J. C. Moore et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2010)
NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-Related Facilities: US National and 11 Site-Specific Surveys
Michael R. Greenberg
RISK ANALYSIS (2009)
Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust
Michael Siegrist et al.
APPETITE (2007)
Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge
M Siegrist et al.
RISK ANALYSIS (2000)
The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology
M Siegrist
RISK ANALYSIS (2000)
Share Paper
