4.7 Article

Wastewater treatment technology selection under various influent conditions and effluent standards based on life cycle assessment

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104562

Keywords

WWTP; Resource recovery; Environmental impacts; Cost; Energy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778325, 51678337]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2017ZX07103007, 2018ZX07111006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influent concentration and effluent standards have strong impacts on technology selection by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and on resource recovery processes. In this paper, resource recovery simulation scenarios incorporated with conventional WWTP models were designed in an imitation of typical existing facilities. We integrated economic analysis and a life cycle assessment to evaluate the impacts of treatment technologies selected for different influent conditions and effluent standards. The results revealed that high concentration influents required the most complicated treatment processes to meet a strict effluent standard. The pattern of total impacts was strongly dependent on the influent conditions. High concentration influent was found to correlate with low energy consumption, low costs, a high nutrient recovery potential but also a high global warming potential when removing 1 kg of pollutants. The incorporation of resource recovery improved the overall performance of WWTPs; however, low concentration influents were not suitable for resource recovery due to their limited benefits. The strict effluent standard limited the resource recovery potential from wastewater, and a loose effluent standard may improve the resource recovery performance, especially for high concentration influents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available