4.7 Article

Utilization of industrial and agricultural wastes for productions of sustainable roller compacted concrete pavement mixes containing reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104504

Keywords

RAP; RCCP; Wastes; Strength; Durability; Sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asphalt pavement recycling has become a common practice across the globe and has been successfully employed in construction of new pavements. While several studies considered utilization of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) aggregates for flexible and rigid pavements, very few attempted its possibility for roller compacted concrete pavements (RCCP). Additionally, studies on the possibility of enhancing the proportion of RAP for RCCP are very scanty. The present study is an attempt to increase the potential of RCCP mixes containing 50% RAP (dust contaminated & stiffened asphalt coated: SCRAP via including various industrial and agricultural wastes such as Silica Fume, Fly ash, and Sugarcane ash as partial replacement of conventional cement. It was observed that the inclusion of the stated admixtures had an insignificant effect on the density of the fresh RCCP mixes, however, increased the moisture demand considerably. In fact, the results firmly indicated the potential of silica fume for RAP-RCCP blends, as, it not only enhanced the physical and mechanical properties, but found to improve the durability of RCCP mixes considerably. Also, utilization of silica fume was found to be economical & environmentally friendly amongst all wastes: with reduced initial construction cost & CO2 emissions by up to 8.4% & 9.7%. As far as the other industrial wastes are concerned, 15% fly ash could also be utilized for producing sustainable RCCP mixes, whereas, higher dosage of fly ash (30%) and sugarcane ash (10 & 15%) may be employed as base layer material of conventional concrete pavements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available