4.7 Article

Improved high solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by moderate in situ ammonia stripping and its relation to metabolic pathway

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 2380-2389

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.093

Keywords

Chicken manure; In situ ammonia stripping; Anaerobic digestion; Metabolic pathway; High solid

Funding

  1. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [6182017]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic digestion is a promising technology for the treatment of chicken manure but its application has limitations due to the inhibition induced by high concentration of ammonium nitrogen. In this study, the methane yield and methanogenic pathway of high solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure, and their response to total ammonium nitrogen (TAN) variations with and without ammonia stripping were investigated through 194 days' continuously fed experiment. The results obtained show a 20% reduction in the TAN and a 30% reduction of volatile fatty acids by a moderate in-situ ammonia stripping. Methane yield increased by 34% and the enhanced acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activities were significant. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Cloacimonetes were dominant at a TAN range of 5.8-6.8 g/L Methanosarcina sp. was the dominant archaea and its relative abundance increased with in-situ ammonia stripping. The shifts of methanogenic pathway with and without stripping was quantified by 2-C-13 stable isotope probing and was consistent with the microbial community's changes. The positive effects achieved by in-situ ammonia stripping set the foundation for its use in the anaerobic digestion process of nitrogen-rich and high solid materials during treatment management. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available