4.7 Article

Alternative heating systems for northern remote communities: Techno-economic analysis of ground-coupled heat pumps in Kuujjuaq, Nunavik, Canada

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 1540-1553

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.039

Keywords

Renewable energy; Geothermal; Nunavik; Ground-coupled heat pump; G.POT; Life cycle cost

Funding

  1. Institut Nordique du Quebec (INQ) through the Northern Geothermal Potential Research Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nunavik is a subarctic remote region covering the northern third of Quebec, Canada, where low efficiency and environmentally adverse diesel furnaces are currently used to meet residential heating demand. Studies focusing on building heating alternatives in subarctic climate are limited and hence, this work can help with the development of such systems in remote off-grid communities. Shallow geothermal potential was mapped for Kuujjuaq, the largest village in Nunavik. Four ground-coupled heat pump scenarios were analysed for a simulated 5-occupant residential dwelling, with heating needs of 71 MWh/ year. Resulting maps show a relatively high ground potential for such cold region, ranging between 5.8MWh/year and 22.9 MWh/year per borehole for heat exchanger lengths of 100 m-300 m. A 50-year life-cycle cost analysis of such systems reveal that a compression heat pump with electricity derived from solar photovoltaic panels has a net present cost as low as approximately CAD$179,000, representing the most economically attractive heating option in Kuujjuaq as compared to the currently subsidized, diesel furnace heating at CAD$277,000. This work verifies that shallow geothermal energy through state-of-the-art heat pumps is a financially interesting option in Kuujjuaq. Results can be extended to similar subarctic settings in Canada and worldwide. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available