4.7 Article

Comparisons of next-day solar forecasting for Singapore using 3DVAR and 4DVAR data assimilation approaches with the WRF model

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 663-671

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.011

Keywords

Numerical weather prediction; Tropical; Irradiance forecasting; WRFDA

Funding

  1. Singapore Economic Development Board under Weather Intelligence for Renewable Energy [EIRP07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For tropical locations forecasting of solar irradiance at time horizons of 12 h, or longer, can only be achieved with the assistance of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. NWP models simulate the time evolution of atmospheric processes that are important for the prediction of solar irradiance. We use the Weather and Research Forecasting (WRF) model to simulate the atmosphere over Singapore down to 3-km resolution and for the years 2015-2016. However, by their nature the NWP models suffer from incomplete knowledge of atmospheric initial conditions. The process of Data Assimilation (DA) attempts to minimise the initial condition problem by incorporating observations into the model. DA utilises observations to constrain the state of the model either in a static (3DVAR) or time-evolving (4DVAR) manner. We compare hourly next-day forecasts using 3DVAR and 4DVAR intialisations of the WRF model with observations of surface irradiance across Singapore. Raw results show that 4DVAR has the lowest error for all time horizons and for all sky conditions except clear-sky hours. We then post-process the raw results using the random forest algorithm. Following post-processing, the 4DVAR initialised forecasts remain the best performing with relative RMSE of 37%. All models after post-processing out-perform persistence ensemble and climatological references. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available