4.5 Review

Large-format fused deposition additive manufacturing: a review

Journal

RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 793-799

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-05-2018-0126

Keywords

Materials; 3D printing; Fused filament fabrication; Design for additive manufacturing; Large-format additive manufacturing; Pellet-based additive manufacturing

Funding

  1. Junta de Andalucia (Research group INNANOMAT) [TEP-946]
  2. UE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The build volumes of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are increasing in size. This improvement is associated with the growing reliability of AM processes and is driven by a rise in demand from several industries. Large-format additive manufacturing (LFAM), when referring to polymeric extrusion systems, is quite new in the field of AM. The purpose of this paper is to present a review of large-format (those with build volumes over 1 m(3)) fused deposition or extrusion-based AM equipment. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents an exhaustive literature review for all the publications in the field of AM in the current decade, as well as technological coverage in the news, specialized blogs and technology fairs since the year 2015. Findings This review reveals growing scientific and industrial activity, as well as in equipment, in the field of LFAM. An increase in research activity is also occurring in parallel with a growing interest, potential and adaptation of these technologies in certain industries. Originality/value This review may be the first publication to collect the majority of existing information on LFAM for polymeric extrusion systems in terms of applied extrusion technologies, commercial products, specific material research and developments, intellectual property, design and simulation solutions, as well as its practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available