4.4 Article

An ultrasound-assisted sample preparation method of carbonatite rock for determination of rare earth elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8732

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale A method for the determination of rare earth elements in carbonatite rocks by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was developed. Methods An alkaline rock, carbonatite, was submitted to ultrasound-assisted extraction (USAE) using an ultrasound bath, a cup horn system or an ultrasound probe. The main USAE parameters were evaluated, such as extraction time (1 to 30 min), extraction temperature (20 to 100 degrees C) and ultrasound amplitude (10 to 100%). For ICP-MS, a desolvation system (APEX-Q) was used to reduce interference in lanthanide determination. To evaluate if the effect of ultrasound improved extraction, experiments were carried out using magnetic stirring (500 rpm) for comparison. Results The temperature and ultrasound amplitude optimized for the method were 70 degrees C and 40%, respectively, using dilute nitric acid (3% v/v). Quantitative analyte recoveries were obtained using an ultrasound bath (25 kHz/100 W) which allowed for the simultaneous extraction of twelve replicates. Conclusions All the results obtained with the use of ultrasound systems were better than those obtained with mechanical stirring. The extracts were suitable for ICP-MS analysis and the results were in agreement with those obtained by the reference method (using wet acid digestion). Based on the results, the use of USAE can be considered an alternative method for sample preparation of carbonatite rocks, under milder conditions, for further ICP-MS analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available