4.7 Article

Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy for peripheral lung tumors

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 46-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.013

Keywords

MR-guided radiation therapy; Adaptive radiotherapy; SABR; Lung cancer

Funding

  1. Swiss Cancer Research Foundation [BIL KFS-4380-02-2018]
  2. Swiss Cancer League section Basel [KlbB-4468-03-2018]
  3. University Hospital Basel, Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: We studied the benefits of using stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for delivery of SABR in peripherally located lung tumors. Methods and materials: Twenty-three patients (25 peripheral lung tumors) underwent SMART in 3-8 fractions on an MR Linac or Cobalt-60 system. Before each fraction, a breath-hold MR scan was acquired, followed by on-table plan adaptation based on the anatomy-of-the-day. Breath-hold gated delivery was performed under continuous MR-guidance using an in-room monitor. Benefits of on-table adaptation were studied by comparing 112 predicted plans, which are the baseline plans recalculated on the anatomy-of-the-day, with the on-table reoptimized plans. Results: The full SMART procedure took a median of 48 and 62 minutes on the MR Linac and Cobalt-60 system, respectively. Median SMART-PTVs were 9.5 cm(3) (range, 3.1-55.6). In 14 patients who had undergone a free-breathing 4DCT, SMART-PTVs measured 53.7% (range, 31.9-75.0) of PTVs that would have been generated using a motion-encompassing internal target volume approach. On-table adaptation improved prescription dose coverage of the PTV from a median of 92.1% in predicted plans, to 95.0% in reoptimized ones, thereby increasing the proportion of fractions delivering >= 100 Gy (BED10Gy) to 95% of PTV, from 90.2% to 100.0%. Conclusion: Delivery of gated breath-hold SABR using MR-guidance resulted in significantly smaller target volumes than would have been the case with an ITV-based approach. Although on-table adaptation ensured delivery of ablative doses in all fractions, the dosimetric benefits were modest, suggesting that daily online plan adaptation may not benefit most patients with peripheral lung tumors. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available