4.7 Article

Calibrating bacterial tetraether distributions towards in situ soil temperature and application to a loess-paleosol sequence

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106172

Keywords

Quaternary; Paleoclimatology; China; Organic biomarkers; brGDGTs; Soil temperature; Vegetation; Paleotempetature reconstruction; Loess-paleosol sequences

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB40010100, XDA2007020202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41602183]
  3. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research program [2019QZKK0101]
  4. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (brGDGTs) produced by soil-dwelling bacteria offer a promising tool for reconstructing terrestrial temperatures. However, in most previous studies, due to lack of soil temperature data, brGDGTs are calibrated to the air rather than the soil temperature. This may impede our understanding of the accurate response of brGDGTs to temperature, and thus affect the quantitative paleotemperature reconstruction using these lipids. Here, we investigated modern soil brGDGTs and the corresponding soil temperature across a large climatic gradient in China (mean annual soil temperature (MAST) range: -2.7 to 26.2 degrees C). The results show that the MAST is higher than the mean annual air temperature (MAAT) by 0-6 degrees C, and the difference is related to vegetation coverage. This supports the idea that vegetation can modulate MAST and points to the necessity of exploring the direct response of brGDGTs to soil temperature. Employing stepwise regression ((sr)), we developed MAST(sr) and MAAT(sr) calibrations, which improve accuracy and reduce the error compared with previous global MAAT calibrations. In Lantian loess-paleosols, the MAST(sr) calibration resulted in similar to 4 degrees C lower glacial temperatures and a similar to 10 degrees C deglacial warming comparable with other terrestrial records and climate models. However, the global MAT(mr) and MBT'/CBT calibrations produced abnormally higher glacial temperatures, while the empirical MAAT(sr) calibration overestimate MAAT during the deglacial period with low vegetation coverage. This demonstrates that the calibration with soil temperature is preferred for quantitative paleotemperature reconstruction. Nevertheless, soil brGDGTs might be useful for inferring MAAT if underlying surface conditions are sufficiently constrained. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available