4.7 Article

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation in a high-risk sample of children, adolescents and young adults in residential youth care - Associations with adverse childhood experiences and mental health problems

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112778

Keywords

Adverse childhood experiences (ACE); HPA Axis; Cortisol; Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA); Istitutional care; Continuity of care

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Justice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) lead to devastating long-term health consequences that are associated with a dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Children and adolescents living in institutional care have an increased risk to experience ACEs, particularly linked to missing continuity of care, and a higher risk for consequences of ACEs such as mental disorders. In order to improve the overall quality of care, it is important to better understand the stress-physiology of this high-risk sample and to identify specific stressors linked to adverse outcomes. Therefore, we assessed ACEs due to missing continuity of care and their association with hair cortisol and DHEA levels in children, adolescents and young adults in institutional care. Results show that ACES resulting from the family of origin, in detail maternal mental illness, and ACEs due to out-of-home placement, namely frequent change of caregivers, are associated with HPA axis over-activation. HPA axis activation is associated with enhanced mental health problems. These results point towards an association between continuity of care and the stress system of children and adolescents in this high-risk sample. Care concepts that focus on continuity of care might help to reduce these physiological alterations and devastating long-term consequences following ACEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available