4.6 Article

Richardson number criteria for direct-contact-condensation-induced thermal stratification using visualization

Journal

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103095

Keywords

Thermal stratification; Richardson number; Direct contact condensation; Visualization; Suppression pool

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to suggest a dimensionless number to determine the formation and disappearance of thermal stratification induced by direct contact condensation in a 1/20 scaled-down suppression pool of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. The modified Richardson number, which represents the ratio of buoyancy force to inertia of steam, was employed to explain the thermal stratification in the suppression pool. Steam condensation experiments were performed at both sub-atmospheric and atmospheric pressures. A blow-down pipe with an inner diameter of 12.7 mm was used to inject and condense steam in the suppression pool. The effects of steam mass on the thermal stratification behaviors were examined by varying the steam mass flow rate (mass flux) from 0.50 kg/hr (1.10 kg/m(2).s) to 2.50 kg/hr (5.48 kg/m(2).s). The steam condensation was visualized using a high-speed camera. In the results, thermal stratification was successfully reproduced in this study, and it was observed that the behaviors of thermal stratification (vertical temperature profile) was affected by the steam mass flow rate and the subcooling temperature. The Richardson number was evaluated by measuring the size and frequency of steam bubbles. The time evolution of the Richardson number was analyzed with vertical temperature profiles of water in the suppression pool. The critical Richardson number, which determines the formation and disappearance of thermal stratification, was suggested to be of the order of 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available