4.8 Article

Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1914677117

Keywords

protein structure prediction; deep learning; protein contact prediction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 11871290, 61873185]
  2. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation [161003]
  3. Key Laboratory for Medical Data Analysis and Statistical Research of Tianjin
  4. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of China
  5. China Scholarship Council
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01-GM092802-07]
  8. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [HHSN272201700059C]
  9. Schmidt Family Foundation
  10. Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health [DP5OD026389]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prediction of interresidue contacts and distances from coevolutionary data using deep learning has considerably advanced protein structure prediction. Here, we build on these advances by developing a deep residual network for predicting interresidue orientations, in addition to distances, and a Rosetta-constrained energy-minimization protocol for rapidly and accurately generating structure models guided by these restraints. In benchmark tests on 13th Community-Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13)- and Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO)-derived sets, the method outperforms all previously described structure-prediction methods. Although trained entirely on native proteins, the network consistently assigns higher probability to de novo-designed proteins, identifying the key fold-determining residues and providing an independent quantitative measure of the ideality of a protein structure. The method promises to be useful for a broad range of protein structure prediction and design problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available