Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The Forgotten History of Signal Detection Theory
John T. Wixted
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION (2020)
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
Stephan Lewandowsky et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Amanda Kvarven et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)
Retire statistical significance
Valentin Amrhein et al.
NATURE (2019)
Rein in the four horsemen of irreproducibility
Dorothy Bishop
NATURE (2019)
What's next for Registered Reports?
Chris Chambers
NATURE (2019)
Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate
Christopher J. Bryan et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2019)
What’s next for psychology’s embattled field of social priming
Tom Chivers
NATURE (2019)
Abandon Statistical Significance
Blakeley B. McShane et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications
D. P. Morgan et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2019)
Metastudies for robust tests of theory
Beth Baribault et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
The preregistration revolution
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries Responses
Rolf A. Zwaan et al.
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2018)
The Prior Odds of Testing a True Effect in Cognitive and Social Psychology
Brent M. Wilson et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
An a priori solution to the replication crisis
David Trafimow
PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
The Regression Trap and Other Pitfalls of Replication ScienceIllustrated by the Report of the Open Science Collaboration
Klaus Fiedler et al.
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies
Benjamin O. Turner et al.
COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY (2018)
A manifesto for reproducible science
Marcus R. Munafo et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2017)
Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Daniel T. Gilbert et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Response to Comment on Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Christopher J. Anderson et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress
Christian S. Crandall et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Do Subtle Reminders of Money Change People's Political Views?
Doug Rohrer et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2015)
Is Psychology Suffering From a Replication Crisis? What Does Failure to Replicate Really Mean?
Scott E. Maxwell et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2015)
p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results
Uri Simonsohn et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors
Andrew Gelman et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication
Wolfgang Stroebe et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
The Value of Direct Replication
Daniel J. Simons
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Improving the Dependability of Research in Personality and Social Psychology: Recommendations for Research and Educational Practice
David C. Funder et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW (2014)
The New Statistics: Why and How
Geoff Cumming
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
Jens B. Asendorpf et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY (2013)
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
C. Glenn Begley et al.
NATURE (2012)
Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's 'Retroactive Facilitation of Recall' Effect
Stuart J. Ritchie et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
Most Reported Genetic Associations With General Intelligence Are Probably False Positives
Christopher F. Chabris et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Correcting the Past: Failures to Replicate Psi
Jeff Galak et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2012)
Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined
Harold Pashler et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect
Daryl J. Bem
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication Is Neglected in the Social Sciences
Stefan Schmidt
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)