4.7 Article

Bioactive compounds-rich powders: Influence of different carriers and drying techniques on the chemical stability of the Hibiscus acetosella extract

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 360, Issue -, Pages 383-391

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.062

Keywords

Hibiscus acetosella; Spray-drying; Freeze-drying; Gum Arabic; Inulin; Extract powder; Accelerated storage test

Funding

  1. FAPEAM (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado deAmazonas - FIXAM/AM) [062.00917/2015]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Laboratorio de Microscopia do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa da Amazifinia (INPA)
  4. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - MCTI/CT-AGRONEGOCIO/CT-AMA-ZONIA) [403496/2013-6]
  5. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - Universal CNPq) [401508/2016-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of different drying methods (freeze- and spray-drying) and carriers (gum Arabic and inulin) on the powder characterization and stability of the bioactive compounds of Hibiscus acetosella extract (HAE) during storage were evaluated. The H-1 NMR spectrum of the HAE revealed characteristic signals of the caffeoyl hydroxycitric acid. The encapsulated extract powder presented different morphology according to the drying processes. The powders produced by the freeze-drying process presented higher retention of bioactive compounds due to the low temperature process. The mixture of gum Arabic and inulin as carrier resulted in the absorption of larger amount of water. The half-life time of the encapsulated extract powders ranged from 31 to 36 h (DPPH) and from 34 to 71 h (phenolic compounds). In general, the powders constituted of gum Arabic and recovered by the freeze-drying process presented better protection and retention of the bioactive compounds from the HAE. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available