4.5 Article

Chitosan-modified graphene oxide as a modifier for improving the structure and performance of forward osmosis membranes

Journal

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 807-816

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.4816

Keywords

GO-CS; FO membrane; water flux; reverse salt flux

Funding

  1. Public Welfare Technology Applied Research Projects in Zhejiang Province [2016C33014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitosan (CS) with good hydrophilicity and charged property was used to modify graphene oxide (GO), the obtained GO-CS was used as a novel modifier to fabricate thin film composite forward osmosis (FO) membranes. The results revealed that the amino groups on CS reacted with carboxyl groups on GO, and the lamellar structure of the GO nanosheets was peeled off by CS, resulting in the reducing of their thicknesses. The GO-CS improved the hydrophilicity of polyethersulfone (PES) substrate, and their contact angles decreased to 64 degrees with the addition of GO-CS in the substrate. GO-CS also increased the porosity of the substrate and surface roughness of FO membrane, thereby optimizing the water flux and reverse salt flux of FO membrane. The average water flux of the FO membrane reached the optimal flux of 21.34 L/(m(2) h) when GO-CS addition was 0.5 wt%, and further addition of GO-CS to the substrate would decrease the water flux of FO membrane, and the reverse salt flux also decreased to the lowest value of 2.26 g/(m(2) h). However, the salt rejection of the membrane increased from 91.4% to 95.1% when GO-CS addition increased from 0.5 to 1.0 wt% under FO mode using 1 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as draw solution (DS). In addition, high osmotic pressure favored water permeation, and at the same concentration of DS, magnesium chloride (MgCl2) exhibited better properties than NaCl. These results all suggested that GO-CS was a good modifier to fabricate FO membrane, and MgCl2 was a good DS candidate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available