4.8 Article

Comparative analysis of epigenetic inhibitors reveals different degrees of interference with transcriptional gene silencing and induction of DNA damage

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 68-84

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14612

Keywords

DNA methylation; genome stability; DNA damage; cytidine analog; epigenetic inhibitors; Arabidopsis thaliana; Vicia faba

Categories

Funding

  1. DAAD
  2. ERDF project `Plants as a tool for sustainable global development' [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827]
  3. INTER-COST from the MEYS, Czech Republic [LTC18026]
  4. GA CR grant [19-13848S]
  5. Czech Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Repetitive DNA sequences and some genes are epigenetically repressed by transcriptional gene silencing (TGS). When genetic mutants are not available or problematic to use, TGS can be suppressed by chemical inhibitors. However, informed use of epigenetic inhibitors is partially hampered by the absence of any systematic comparison. In addition, there is emerging evidence that epigenetic inhibitors cause genomic instability, but the nature of this damage and its repair remain unclear. To bridge these gaps, we compared the effects of 5-azacytidine (AC), 2 '-deoxy-5-azacytidine (DAC), zebularine and 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep) on TGS and DNA damage repair. The most effective inhibitor of TGS was DAC, followed by DZNep, zebularine and AC. We confirmed that all inhibitors induce DNA damage and suggest that this damage is repaired by multiple pathways with a critical role of homologous recombination and of the SMC5/6 complex. A strong positive link between the degree of cytidine analog-induced DNA demethylation and the amount of DNA damage suggests that DNA damage is an integral part of cytidine analog-induced DNA demethylation. This helps us to understand the function of DNA methylation in plants and opens the possibility of using epigenetic inhibitors in biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available