4.7 Article

The 18O-signal transfer from water vapour to leaf water and assimilates varies among plant species and growth forms

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 510-523

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13682

Keywords

carbohydrates; clouds; compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA); fog; foliar water uptake; leaf wetting; precipitation; rain

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_166162]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_166162] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The O-18 signature of atmospheric water vapour (delta O-18(V)) is known to be transferred via leaf water to assimilates. It remains, however, unclear how the O-18-signal transfer differs among plant species and growth forms. We performed a 9-hr greenhouse fog experiment (relative humidity >= 98%) with O-18-depleted water vapour (-106.7 parts per thousand) on 140 plant species of eight different growth forms during daytime. We quantified the O-18-signal transfer by calculating the mean residence time of O in leaf water (MRTLW) and sugars (MRTSugars) and related it to leaf traits and physiological drivers. MRTLW increased with leaf succulence and thickness, varying between 1.4 and 10.8 hr. MRTSugars was shorter in C-3 and C-4 plants than in crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants and highly variable among species and growth forms; MRTSugars was shortest for grasses and aquatic plants, intermediate for broadleaf trees, shrubs, and herbs, and longest for conifers, epiphytes, and succulents. Sucrose was more sensitive to delta O-18(V) variations than other assimilates. Our comprehensive study shows that plant species and growth forms vary strongly in their sensitivity to delta O-18(V) variations, which is important for the interpretation of delta O-18 values in plant organic material and compounds and thus for the reconstruction of climatic conditions and plant functional responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available