4.0 Article

Psychological Distress among Patients Attending Physiotherapy: A Survey-Based Investigation of Irish Physiotherapists' Current Practice and Opinions

Journal

PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 239-248

Publisher

UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC
DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0010

Keywords

holistic health; mental health; psychological distress; psychology; rehabilitation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose:The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the current practice and opinions of members of the Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists (ISCP) with respect to the care of patients in psychological distress.Method:This was a cross-sectional, survey-based investigation of Irish physiotherapists. An electronic survey was sent by email to the ISCP membership. It consisted of closed- and open-ended questions, as well as opinion questions with Likert scale responses.Results:More than 80% of the respondents reported that they encountered patients with psychological distress at least once a week. A lack of education in the area of mental health emerged as a predominant theme. Reflecting on current practice, many discussed the importance of addressing underlying psychological issues before or in tandem with physical issues. Respondents who had engaged in further education in mental health, psychology, or both rated their confidence in recognizing the signs and symptoms of psychological distress higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, a greater proportion of these respondents routinely assessed for psychological distress in their clinical practice (p < 0.001).Conclusion:Physiotherapists regularly encounter patients whom they perceive to have high levels of psychological distress. Irish physiotherapists displayed positive attitudes toward patients' psychological well-being. However, additional education in mental health was a recognized need in the profession.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available