4.7 Article

Geometric inequivalence of metric and Palatini formulations of General Relativity

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 802, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135275

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) [FPU 2015]
  2. (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) [FPU15/05406, FPU15/02864]
  3. Ramon y Cajal [RYC-2013-13019]
  4. Atraccion de Talento Investigadorprogramme of the Comunidad de Madrid [2018-T1/TIC-10431]
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [PTDC/FIS-OUT/29048/2017]
  6. Spanish projects [FIS2017-84440-C2-1-P, FIS2014-57387-C3-1-P]
  7. i-LINK1215 (CSIC) [H2020-MSCA-RISE-2017, FunFiCO-777740, SEJI/2017/042]
  8. Consolider Program [CPANPHY-1205388, SEV2014-0398]
  9. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Projective invariance is a symmetry of the Palatini version of General Relativity which is not present in the metric formulation. The fact that the Riemann tensor changes nontrivially under projective transformations implies that, unlike in the usual metric approach, in the Palatini formulation this tensor is subject to a gauge freedom, which allows some ambiguities even in its scalar contractions. In this sense, we show that for the Schwarzschild solution there exists a projective gauge in which the (affine) Kretschmann scalar, K (R beta mu nu R alpha beta mu nu)-R-alpha, can be set to vanish everywhere. This puts forward that the divergence of curvature scalars may, in some cases, be avoided by a gauge transformation of the connection. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available