4.8 Article

Time-Integrated Neutrino Source Searches with 10 Years of IceCube Data

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.051103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USA: U.S. National Science Foundation-Office of Polar Programs
  2. USA: U.S. National Science Foundation-Physics Division
  3. USA: Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  4. USA: Center for High Throughput Computing (CHTC) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
  5. USA: Open Science Grid (OSG)
  6. USA: Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE)
  7. USA: Particle astrophysics research computing center at the University of Maryland
  8. USA: Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research at Michigan State University
  9. USA: Astroparticle physics computational facility at Marquette University
  10. Belgium: Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS)
  11. Belgium: Fund for Scientific Research (FWO)
  12. Belgium: FWO Odysseus programme
  13. Belgium: FWO Big Science programme
  14. Belgium: Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (Belspo)
  15. Germany: Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  16. Germany: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  17. Germany: Helmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle Physics (HAP)
  18. Germany: Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association
  19. Germany: Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY)
  20. Germany: High Performance Computing cluster of the RWTH Aachen
  21. Sweden: Swedish Research Council
  22. Sweden: Swedish Polar Research Secretariat
  23. Sweden: Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC)
  24. Sweden: Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  25. Australia: Australian Research Council
  26. Canada: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  27. Canada: Calcul Quebec
  28. Canada: Compute Ontario
  29. Canada: Canada Foundation for Innovation
  30. Canada: WestGrid
  31. Canada: Compute Canada
  32. Denmark: Villum Fonden
  33. Denmark: Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF)
  34. Denmark: Carlsberg Foundation
  35. New Zealand: Marsden Fund
  36. Japan: Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  37. Japan: Institute for Global Prominent Research (IGPR) of Chiba University
  38. Korea: National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  39. Switzerland: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  40. United Kingdom: Department of Physics, University of Oxford
  41. USA: U.S. Department of Energy-National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This Letter presents the results from pointlike neutrino source searches using ten years of IceCube data collected between April 6, 2008 and July 10, 2018. We evaluate the significance of an astrophysical signal from a pointlike source looking for an excess of clustered neutrino events with energies typically above similar to 1 TeV among the background of atmospheric muons and neutrinos. We perform a full-sky scan, a search within a selected source catalog, a catalog population study, and three stacked Galactic catalog searches. The most significant point in the northern hemisphere from scanning the sky is coincident with the Seyfert II galaxy NGC 1068, which was included in the source catalog search. The excess at the coordinates of NGC 1068 is inconsistent with background expectations at the level of 2.9 sigma after accounting for statistical trials from the entire catalog. The combination of this result along with excesses observed at the coordinates of three other sources, including TXS 0506 + 056, suggests that, collectively, correlations with sources in the northern catalog are inconsistent with background at 3.3 sigma significance. The southern catalog is consistent with background. These results, all based on searches for a cumulative neutrino signal integrated over the 10 years of available data, motivate further study of these and similar sources, including time-dependent analyses, multimessenger correlations, and the possibility of stronger evidence with coming upgrades to the detector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available