4.4 Article

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure followed by 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, a report of six cases

Journal

PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101650

Keywords

Human papillomavirus; Cytodiagnosis; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Photodynamic therapy; Combined modality therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877127]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) may progress to cervical cancer if left untreated. The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) of the transitional zone of the cervix is a standard form of treatment. However, human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced CIN may recur after LEEP. The purpose of this case report is to describe the successful use of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) as an adjunct to LEEP, in preventing the recurrence of CIN. Methods: The effectiveness of this combined treatment was evaluated in six women. The diagnosis of HPV-induced CIN was determined using HPV DNA tests and liquid-based cervical cytology. Lesion removal was performed 3 h after application of ALA using a 635 nm light density of 80 mw/cm(2). Results: We treated 6 women aged 31-62 years who had persistent CIN following LEEP, with ALA-PDT (range, 4-7 treatments). Five of the 6 women were HPV negative on retesting 6-7 months after ALA-PDT. Most patients showed no signs of recurrence during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Use of ALA-PDT following LEEP may prevent the recurrence of CIN. Monitoring HPV status by means of DNA testing and liquid-based cytology may be used as a standard for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Post-treatment care should be carefully considered because improper post-treatment care might directly lead to relapse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available