4.4 Article

The effect of the smoking on choroidal thickness, central macular vascular and optic disc perfusion

Journal

PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 142-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.09.005

Keywords

Optic disc perfusion; Macular perfusion; Choroidal thickness; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Angioplex; OCTA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To compare choroidal thickness, central macular vascular perfusion and optic disc perfusion in smokers and non-smokers. Methods: Smoker participants defined group I and non-smoker participants(group II) Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) performed to all volunteers and choroidal thickness, central macular vascular and optic disc perfusion were measured. Results: In group I, 30 eyes of the 30 participants (6 male and 24 female) evaluated and in group II, 32 eyes of the 32 participants (13 male and 19 female) evaluated. The mean age of the volunteers were 43.09 +/- 14.28 and 42.2 +/- 8.24 year-old in group I and group II, respectively. The mean choroidal thickness were 345 +/- 74 mu m and 301.6 +/- 71 mu m in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.022). The mean optic disc perfusions were 45.17 +/- 1.46% and 45.25 +/- 1.43% in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.82). The mean central macular vascular perfusions were 20.20 +/- 7.17% and 18.65 +/- 7.46% in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.4). There are a negative correlation between macular vascular perfusion, optic disc perfusion and smoking period (p = 0.32 and 0.62, respectively.) Conclusion: Our study revealed that smoking statistically significantly effected choroidal thickness but effected central macular vascular and optic disc perfusion changes were not statistically significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available