4.7 Review

Immunobiology and application of toll-like receptor 4 agonists to augment host resistance to infection

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104502

Keywords

Toll-like receptor 4; Lipopolysaccharide; Monophosphoryl lipid A; Phosphorylated hexaacyl disaccharides; Aminoalkyl glucosamine 4-phosphate; Neoseptins; Ugi; Innate immunity; Endotoxin tolerance; Metabolic reprogramming

Funding

  1. U.S. National Institute of Health, Institute of General Medical Sciences [K08 GM123345, R01 GM12171, 5T32GM108554-05, R01 GM119197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infectious diseases remain a threat to critically ill patients, particularly with the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Septic shock carries a mortality of up to similar to 40% with no compelling evidence of promising therapy to reduce morbidity or mortality. Septic shock survivors are also prone to nosocomial infections. Treatment with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonists have demonstrated significant protection against common nosocomial pathogens in various clinically relevant models of infection and septic shock. TLR4 agonists are derived from a bacteria cell wall or synthesized de novo, and more recently novel small molecule TLR4 agonists have also been developed. TLR4 agonists augment innate immune functions including expansion and recruitment of innate leukocytes to the site of infection. Recent studies demonstrate TLR4-induced leukocyte metabolic reprogramming of cellular metabolism to improve antimicrobial function. Metabolic changes include sustained augmentation of macrophage glycolysis, mitochondrial function, and tricarboxylic acid cycle flux. These findings set the stage for the use of TLR4 agonists as standalone therapeutic agents or antimicrobial adjuncts in patient populations vulnerable to nosocomial infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available