4.6 Article

Hormone levels in preterm and donor human milk before and after Holder pasteurization

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 612-617

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-0789-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Iowa-Pecs Neonatology Collaborative Research Fund
  2. Economic Development and Innovation Operational Program [GINOP 2.3.2-15-2016-00021]
  3. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation of the Government of Hungary
  4. [UNKP-19-3-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background After birth, breastfeeding is the exclusive source of hormonal signaling between mother and infant. Hospitalized infants often receive donor milk when their own mother's milk is unavailable. Methods The presence of insulin, leptin, cortisol, progesterone, and testosterone was examined in samples from milk bank donors and mothers of preterm infants. We further investigated the effect of Holder pasteurization (HoP) on hormone levels. Results Comparing nonpasteurized samples, leptin levels were nearly threefold higher in milk from mothers of preterm infants versus donated milk, and regardless of milk source, leptin levels were significantly decreased by HoP. Insulin concentrations were also decreased by HoP, and among mothers of preterm infants, obesity was associated with significantly higher content of leptin and insulin. While combined use of donor milk and HoP was associated with cortisol levels nearly threefold higher than those in nonpasteurized own mother's milk, progesterone and testosterone content did not differ by source or pasteurization. Conclusions The hormonal composition of breast milk is impacted by HoP and maternal obesity. Compared to nonpasteurized maternal milk, use of pasteurized donor milk dramatically decreases the intake of leptin while increasing the intake of cortisol. Further research is necessary to define optimal breast milk processing practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available