4.5 Article

Taste and smell function in Wolfram syndrome

Journal

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-1335-7

Keywords

Wolfram syndrome; DIDMOAD; UPSIT; Sniffin' sticks; Olfaction; Taste; Neurodegeneration

Funding

  1. Hershey, PI [HD070855]
  2. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at Washington University [U54 HD087011]
  3. CTSA [UL1 RR024992]
  4. National Institute on Drug Abuse [5T32DA007261-27]
  5. Diabetes Research Center [DK020579]
  6. Snow Foundation
  7. American Diabetes Association
  8. George Decker and Julio V. Santiago Pediatric Diabetes Research Fund
  9. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
  10. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Wolfram syndrome is a rare genetic disease characterized by insulin-dependent diabetes, optic nerve atrophy, sensorineural hearing loss and neurodegeneration. Although olfactory dysfunction, a classical clinical marker of neurodegenerative processes, has been reported in Wolfram syndrome, its use as a clinical marker in Wolfram is limited due to data scarcity. In addition, it is unknown whether Wolfram syndrome affects the sense of taste. Methods Smell and taste perception were assessed in participants with Wolfram syndrome (n = 40) who were 15.1 +/- 6.0 years of age (range: 5.1-28.7 years) and two sex- and age-matched control groups: one group with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D; n = 25) and a healthy control group (HC; n = 29). Smell sensitivity was assessed by measuring n-butanol detection thresholds and smell identification by using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). Taste function was assessed using NIH Toolbox, which includes the assessment of sucrose (sweet) taste preference, and perceived intensity of sucrose, sodium chloride (salty), and quinine hydrochloride (bitter) both in the tip of the tongue (regional test) and the whole mouth. Results Smell sensitivity was not significantly different among groups; however, smell identification was impaired in Wolfram syndrome, as reflected by significantly lower UPSIT scores in Wolfram syndrome compared to HC and T1D (P < 0.001). Compared to participants in the control groups, participants with Wolfram syndrome had a blunted perception of sweetness and saltiness when taste stimuli were applied regionally (P < 0.05), but differences in perceived intensity were no longer significant among groups when taste stimuli were tasted with the whole mouth. Groups preferred similar sucrose concentrations. Conclusion Wolfram syndrome was associated with olfactory dysfunction. However, the olfactory dysfunction was qualitative (related to smell identification) and not secondary to olfactory insensitivity or diabetes, suggesting is arising from dysfunction in central olfactory brain regions. In contrast to olfaction, and despite decreased perception of taste intensity in the anterior tongue, the sense of taste was overall well-conserved in individuals with Wolfram syndrome. Future longitudinal studies of taste and smell perception in Wolfram syndrome will be important to determine the use of the chemical senses as clinical markers of disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available