4.8 Article

High-throughput prescreening of pharmaceuticals using a genome-wide bacterial bioreporter array

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 699-704

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.01.067

Keywords

Luminescent bacteria; Bacterial reporter; Fluorescent transcriptional reporter; Drug screening

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2010-220-D00019]
  2. Korea University Grant
  3. School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology for BK21 PLUS, Korea University
  4. Minerva Center for Bio-Hybrid Complex Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed the applicability of multi-strain bacterial bioreporter bioassays to drug screening. To this end, we investigated the reactions of a panel of 15 luminescent recombinant Escherichia coli bacterial bioreporters to a library of 420 pharmaceuticals. The panel included bacterial bioreporters associated with oxidative stress, DNA damage, heat shock, and efflux of excess metals. Eighty nine drugs elicited a response from at least one of the panel members and formed distinctive clusters, some of which contained closely related drugs. In addition, we tested a group of selected nine drugs against a collection of about 2000 different fluorescent transcriptional reporters that covers the great majority of gene promoters in E. coli. The sets of induced genes were in accord with the in vitro toxicity of the tested drugs, as reflected by the response patterns of the 15-member panel, and provided more insights into their toxicity mechanisms. Facilitated by microplates and robotic systems, all assays were conducted in high-throughput. Our results thus suggest that multi-strain assemblages of bacterial bioreporters have the potential for playing a significant role in drug development alongside current in vitro toxicity tests. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available