4.7 Article

Appetite-Related Responses to Overfeeding and Longitudinal Weight Change in Obesity-Prone and Obesity-Resistant Adults

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 259-267

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22687

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR002535] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [UL 1 RR025780, UL1 RR025780] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK048520, K24 DK02935, K24 DK002935, T32 DK07658, R00 DK100465, T32 DK007658, RO1 DK62874, R00DK100465, R01 DK062874, 5 P30 DK048520-21, K01 DK113063] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Appetite responses to 3 days of overfeeding (OF) were examined as correlates of longitudinal weight change in adults classified as obesity prone (OP) or obesity resistant (OR). Methods OP (n = 22) and OR (n = 30) adults consumed a controlled eucaloric and OF diet (140% of energy needs) for 3 days, followed by 3 days of ad libitum feeding. Hunger and satiety were evaluated by visual analog scales. Ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY) levels were measured during a 24-hour inpatient visit on day 3. Body weight and composition were measured annually for 4.0 +/- 1.3 years. Results Dietary restraint and disinhibition were greater in OP than OR (mean difference: 3.5 +/- 1.2 and 3.3 +/- 0.9, respectively; P < 0.01) participants, and disinhibition was associated with longitudinal weight change (n = 48; r = 0.35; P = 0.02). Compared with the eucaloric diet, energy intake fell significantly in OR participants following OF (P = 0.03) but not in OP (P = 0.33) participants. Twenty-four-hour PYY area under the curve values increased with OF in OR (P = 0.02) but not in OP (P = 0.17) participants. Furthermore, changes in PYY levels with OF correlated with measured energy intake (r = -0.36; P= 0.01). Conclusions Baseline disinhibition and PYY responses to OF differed between OP and OR adults. Dietary disinhibition was associated with 5-year longitudinal weight gain. Differences in appetite regulation may underlie differences in propensity for weight gain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available