4.8 Article

Dynamics of DNA nicking and unwinding by the RepC-PcrA complex

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 2013-2025

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [BFU2017-83794-P]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation grant [681299]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. 'Severo Ochoa' postdoctoral contract from the National Center of Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC)
  5. European Research Council [681299]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [681299] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rolling-circle replication is the most common mechanism for the replication of small plasmids carrying antibiotic resistance genes in Gram-positive bacteria. It is initiated by the binding and nicking of double-stranded origin of replication by a replication initiator protein (Rep). Duplex unwinding is then performed by the PcrA helicase, whose processivity is critically promoted by its interaction with Rep. How Rep and PcrA proteins interact to nick and unwind the duplex is not fully understood. Here, we have used magnetic tweezers to monitor PcrA helicase unwinding and its relationship with the nicking activity of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pT181 initiator RepC. Our results indicate that PcrA is a highly processive helicase prone to stochastic pausing, resulting in average translocation rates of 30 bp s(-1), while a typical velocity of 50 bp s(-1) is found in the absence of pausing. Single-strand DNA binding protein did not affect PcrA translocation velocity but slightly increased its processivity. Analysis of the degree of DNA supercoiling required for RepC nicking, and the time between RepC nicking and DNA unwinding, suggests that RepC and PcrA form a protein complex on the DNA binding site before nicking. A comprehensive model that rationalizes these findings is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available