4.4 Article

Micro-syngas technology options for GtL

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 613-622

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22433

Keywords

steam methane reforming; Catalytic partial oxidation; auto-thermal reforming; Fischer-Tropsch; optimization

Funding

  1. ME Resource Corp.
  2. NSERC
  3. Banting Post-Doctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural gas emissions contribute to climate change, and equally importantly, affect the health of populations near gas fields.([1]) At night, the flares from the Bakken fields in North Dakota burn as bright as the lights in cities as large as Minneapolis. Rather than flaring (or worse, venting), this associated natural gas represents a multi-billion dollar opportunity.([2]) Pipelines and liquefying natural gas are cost prohibitive in many cases. Converting methane to fuels is an attractive alternative. We examined three options to convert natural gas to syngas (H2 and CO), which is the first step to producing fuels: Steam Methane Reforming (SMR), Auto-Thermal Reforming (ATR), and Catalytic Partial Oxidation (CPOX). Based on a multi-objective optimization analysis, C5+ hydrocarbon yields are highest with CPOX as the first step followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FT). A micro-refinery with the CPOX-FT process treating 2800kLd-1 (100 MCFd-1) natural gas, produces 1300 Ld-1 (8.2 bbld-1) of C5+ hydrocarbons. Maximum yields for the SMR-FT and ATR-FT processes are 938 Ld-1 and 1100 Ld-1 (5.9 bbld-1, 7.0 bbld-1) of C5+, respectively. Large-scale POX and ATR processes produce 1600 L per 2800 kL (10 bbl per 100 MCF) of natural gas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available