4.0 Article

Hemiboea guangdongensis comb. & stat. nov., a cryptic species segregated from H. subcapitata (Gesneriaceae) based on morphological and molecular data

Journal

NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/njb.02574

Keywords

cryptic species; genetic distance; Hemiboea guangdongensis; Hemiboea subcapitata; phylogeny

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370227, 31300181, 31670212]
  2. Special Funds for Traditional Chinese Medicine Industry [201407003]
  3. Major supporting funds for Characteristic subject of Qiannan Normal College for Nationalities [QNSY2018XK003]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province of China [[2014]2156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The taxonomic problem of cryptic species has long been recognized. Hemiboea subcapitata C. B. Clarke is a widespread and morphologically diverse species including two varieties, H. subcapitata var. subcapitata C. B. Clarke and H. subcapitata var. guangdongensis (Z. Y. Li) Z. Y. Li. However, genetic distance and molecular phylogenetic analyses based on nuclear ITS and four plastid DNA sequences (atpB-rbcL, matK, rbcL, rpS16 intron) revealed that H. subcapitata var. guangdongensis is sister to H. subacaulis, and separated from H. subcapitata var. subcapitata, suggesting that it should be raised to the rank of an independent species as H. guangdongensis (Z. Y. Li) X. Q. Li & X. G. Xiang, comb. & stat. nov. Morphologically, the new species can be distinguished from H. subacaulis by its calyx 5-sect from base, segments narrowly oblong-lanceolate (versus calyx 5-sect from base or 2-lipped and adaxial lip 2-lobed from below middle, segments ovate), peduncle glabrous (versus pubescent), and vermiform sclereids dispersed in leaf mesophyll (versus without sclereids).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available