4.6 Review

Oaks: an evolutionary success story

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 226, Issue 4, Pages 987-1011

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16274

Keywords

adaptation; hybridization; macroevolution; microevolution; migration; phylogeny; Quercus

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [1146488]
  2. Morton Arboretum Center for Tree Science
  3. Fulbright Fellowship - Franco-American Commission
  4. European Union (ERC Advanced grant Treepeace) [339728]
  5. French National Research Agency (ANR) within the Labex COTE [ANR-10-LABX-45]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [339728] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genus Quercus is among the most widespread and species-rich tree genera in the northern hemisphere. The extraordinary species diversity in America and Asia together with the continuous continental distribution of a limited number of European species raise questions about how macro- and microevolutionary processes made the genus Quercus an evolutionary success. Synthesizing conclusions reached during the past three decades by complementary approaches in phylogenetics, phylogeography, genomics, ecology, paleobotany, population biology and quantitative genetics, this review aims to illuminate evolutionary processes leading to the radiation and expansion of oaks. From opposing scales of time and geography, we converge on four overarching explanations of evolutionary success in oaks: accumulation of large reservoirs of diversity within populations and species; ability for rapid migration contributing to ecological priority effects on lineage diversification; high rates of evolutionary divergence within clades combined with convergent solutions to ecological problems across clades; and propensity for hybridization, contributing to adaptive introgression and facilitating migration. Finally, we explore potential future research avenues, emphasizing the integration of microevolutionary and macroevolutionary perspectives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available