4.6 Article

Learning the dynamics of open quantum systems from their steady states

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab73cd

Keywords

quantum information; condensed matter physics; dissipative quantum dynamics; Lindblad dynamics; noise characterization; quantum benchmarking

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [639172]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education, Singapore Academic Research Fund Tier-II [MOE2018-T2-2-142]
  3. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme under REA Grant [631696, FP7/2007-2013]
  4. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency through the DRINQS program [D18AC00025]
  5. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1778/17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent works have shown that generic local Hamiltonians can be efficiently inferred from local measurements performed on their eigenstates or thermal states. Realistic quantum systems are often affected by dissipation and decoherence due to coupling to an external environment. This raises the question whether the steady states of such open quantum systems contain sufficient information allowing for full and efficient reconstruction of the system's dynamics. We find that such a reconstruction is possible for generic local Markovian dynamics. We propose a recovery method that uses only local measurements; for systems with finite-range interactions, the method recovers the Lindbladian acting on each spatial domain using only observables within that domain. We numerically study the accuracy of the reconstruction as a function of the number of measurements, type of open-system dynamics and system size. Interestingly, we show that couplings to external environments can in fact facilitate the reconstruction of Hamiltonians composed of commuting terms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available