4.8 Editorial Material

The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 382, Issue 7, Pages 674-678

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb1901642

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [CH/1996001/9454] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonrandomized observational analyses have been promoted as alternatives to randomized clinical trials. However, randomization ensures balance between groups, whereas nonrandomized studies are often biased by between-group differences. Efforts to reduce the cost and complexity of clinical trials are preferable to relying on observational studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available