4.6 Article

Sparse filtering based domain adaptation for mechanical fault diagnosis

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 393, Issue -, Pages 101-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.02.049

Keywords

Domain adaptation; Sparse filtering; Maximum mean discrepancy; Fault diagnosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975276, 51675262]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB2003300]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-IV-0008-0045]
  4. Advance Research Field Fund Project of China [61400040304]
  5. Project of National Key Research and Development Plan of China New energysaving environmental protection agricultural engine development [2016YFD0700800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, machine learning has achieved considerable success in the field of mechanical fault diagnosis. Nevertheless, in many real-world applications, the original vibration data usually collected under different work conditions which lead to large distribution divergences. As a result, the performances of many machine learning methods may drop dramatically. To overcome this deficiency, domain adaptation is introduced by adapting the regression model or classifier trained in the source domain for use in the distinct but related target domain. Particularly, a novel sparse filtering based domain adaptation approach (SFDA) is proposed for the mechanical fault diagnosis. Comparing with the previous researches, two main contributions of SFDA are concluded as follows: (1) the domain adaptation is applied to the sparse filtering algorithm. (2) The l1-norm and l2-norm are employed to the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). (3) SFDA is easy to be implemented, and high classification accuracy can be obtained. The bearing and gear dataset are utilized to testify the validity and reliability of SFDA. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available