4.7 Article

Glucocerebrosidase activity, cathepsin D and monomeric α-synuclein interactions in a stem cell derived neuronal model of a PD associated GBA1 mutation

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104620

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Glucocerebrosidase; Monomeric alpha-Synuclein; Cathepsin D; Cerezyme; Ambroxol

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council UK [MR/L501499/1, MR/N028651/1]
  2. Parkinson's UK [G-1704]
  3. Kattan Trust [285]
  4. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  5. MRC [MR/N028651/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of GBA1 gene mutations increases risk for Parkinson's disease (PD), but the pathogenic mechanisms of GBA1 associated PD remain unknown. Given that impaired alpha-synuclein turnover is a hallmark of PD pathogenesis and cathepsin D is a key enzyme involved in alpha-synuclein degradation in neuronal cells, we have examined the relationship of glucocerebrosidase (GCase), cathepsin D and monomeric alpha-synuclein in human neural crest stem cell derived dopaminergic neurons. We found that normal activity of GCase is necessary for cathepsin D to perform its function of monomeric alpha-synuclein removal from neurons. GBA1 mutations lead to a lower level of cathepsin D protein and activity, and higher level of monomeric alpha-synuclein in neurons. When GBA1 mutant neurons were treated with GCase replacement or chaperone therapy; cathepsin D protein levels and activity were restored, and monomeric alpha-synuclein decreased. When cathepsin D was inhibited, GCase replacement failed to reduce monomeric alpha-synuclein levels in GBA1 mutant neurons. These data indicate that GBA1 gene mutations increase monomeric alpha-synuclein levels via an effect on lysosomal cathepsin D in neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available