4.6 Article

Kidney transplantation in the extremely elderly from extremely aged deceased donors: a kidney for each age

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 687-696

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz293

Keywords

age-matching allocation; extremely aged donor; extremely elderly recipient; kidney transplantation; outcomes

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [Proyecto Integrado de Excelencia (PIE)] [13/00045]
  2. Subdireccion General de Redes y Centros de Investigacion Cooperativa, Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spanish Renal Research Network [REDinREN] [RD12/0021/0029]
  3. European Development Regional Fund (EDRF) 'A way to achieve Europe'
  4. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena (FMM)
  5. ISN-Saulo Klahr
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP 18/00073]
  7. Plan Nacional de IthornDthornI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Advances in life expectancy have led to an increase in the number of elderly people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Scarce information is available on the outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) in extremely elderly patients based on an allocation policy prioritizing donor-recipient age matching. Methods. We included recipients >= 75 years that underwent KT from similarly aged deceased donors at our institution between 2002 and 2015. Determinants of death-censored graft and patient survival were assessed by Cox regression. Results. We included 138 recipients with a median follow-up of 38.8 months. Median (interquartile range) age of recipients and donors was 77.5 (76.3-79.7) and 77.0 years (74.7-79.0), with 22.5% of donors >= 80 years. Primary graft non-function occurred in 8.0% (11/138) of patients. Cumulative incidence rates for post-transplant infection and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 70.3% (97/138) and 15.2% (21/138), respectively. One- and 5-year patient survival were 82.1 and 60.1%, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates for death-censored graft survival were 95.6 and 93.1%. Infection was the leading cause of death (46.0% of fatal cases). The occurrence of BPAR was associated with lower 1-year patient survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-10.82; P=0.003]. Diabetic nephropathy was the only factor predicting 5-year death-censored graft survival (HR = 4.82, 95% CI 1.08-21.56; P=0.040). Conclusions. ESRD patients >= 75 years can access KT and remain dialysis free for their remaining lifespan by using grafts from extremely aged deceased donors, yielding encouraging results in terms of recipient and graft survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available