4.7 Review

Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 67-83

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R35 GM118160] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE [ZIALM000061, ZIALM000073] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number and diversity of known CRISPR-Cas systems have substantially increased in recent years. Here, we provide an updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems and cas genes, with an emphasis on the major developments that have occurred since the publication of the latest classification, in 2015. The new classification includes 2 classes, 6 types and 33 subtypes, compared with 5 types and 16 subtypes in 2015. A key development is the ongoing discovery of multiple, novel class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, which now include 3 types and 17 subtypes. A second major novelty is the discovery of numerous derived CRISPR-Cas variants, often associated with mobile genetic elements that lack the nucleases required for interference. Some of these variants are involved in RNA-guided transposition, whereas others are predicted to perform functions distinct from adaptive immunity that remain to be characterized experimentally. The third highlight is the discovery of numerous families of ancillary CRISPR-linked genes, often implicated in signal transduction. Together, these findings substantially clarify the functional diversity and evolutionary history of CRISPR-Cas. The number and diversity of known CRISPR-Cas systems have substantially increased in recent years. In this Review, Koonin and colleagues provide an updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems and cas genes, with an emphasis on major developments, and outline a complete scenario for the origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available