4.6 Article

Harnessing cancer immunotherapy during the unexploited immediate perioperative period

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 313-326

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0319-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  2. Israel Ministry of Science
  3. Israeli Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgery remains a key pillar of cancer therapy, particular for those with curable, localized disease. The immediate perioperative period (days before and after surgery) is associated with various psychological and physiological stresses and associated factors, including inflammatory mediators, that might promote cancer progression and thus determine long-term outcomes. Herein, the authors present the hypothesis and supporting evidence that the use of certain types of immunotherapy, together with interventions to abrogate stress-inflammatory responses, in conjunction with surgery might improve the overall success of cancer treatment. The immediate perioperative period (days before and after surgery) is hypothesized to be crucial in determining long-term cancer outcomes: during this short period, numerous factors, including excess stress and inflammatory responses, tumour-cell shedding and pro-angiogenic and/or growth factors, might facilitate the progression of pre-existing micrometastases and the initiation of new metastases, while simultaneously jeopardizing immune control over residual malignant cells. Thus, application of anticancer immunotherapy during this critical time frame could potentially improve patient outcomes. Nevertheless, this strategy has rarely been implemented to date. In this Perspective, we discuss apparent contraindications for the perioperative use of cancer immunotherapy, suggest safe immunotherapeutic and other anti-metastatic approaches during this important time frame and specify desired characteristics of such interventions. These characteristics include a rapid onset of immune activation, avoidance of tumour-promoting effects, no or minimal increase in surgical risk, resilience to stress-related factors and minimal induction of stress responses. Pharmacological control of excess perioperative stress-inflammatory responses has been shown to be clinically feasible and could potentially be combined with immune stimulation to overcome the direct pro-metastatic effects of surgery, prevent immune suppression and enhance immunostimulatory responses. Accordingly, we believe that certain types of immunotherapy, together with interventions to abrogate stress-inflammatory responses, should be evaluated in conjunction with surgery and, for maximal effectiveness, could be initiated before administration of adjuvant therapies. Such strategies might improve the overall success of cancer treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available