4.7 Article

A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 877-924

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [BE 4492/1-2, HE 7074/1-1]
  2. Australian Research Council [ARC LP100200084, ARC IC160100026]
  3. Wesley Hospital Foundation
  4. AO Foundation
  5. Princess Alexandra Hospital Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This protocol describes how to establish an ovine critical-size, segmental bone defect model to study bone regeneration and reconstruction. Critical-size bone defects, which require large-volume tissue reconstruction, remain a clinical challenge. Bone engineering has the potential to provide new treatment concepts, yet clinical translation requires anatomically and physiologically relevant preclinical models. The ovine critical-size long-bone defect model has been validated in numerous studies as a preclinical tool for evaluating both conventional and novel bone-engineering concepts. With sufficient training and experience in large-animal studies, it is a technically feasible procedure with a high level of reproducibility when appropriate preoperative and postoperative management protocols are followed. The model can be established by following a procedure that includes the following stages: (i) preoperative planning and preparation, (ii) the surgical approach, (iii) postoperative management, and (iv) postmortem analysis. Using this model, full results for peer-reviewed publication can be attained within 2 years. In this protocol, we comprehensively describe how to establish proficiency using the preclinical model for the evaluation of a range of bone defect reconstruction options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available