4.7 Article

Cell-type-specific drug-inducible protein synthesis inhibition demonstrates that memory consolidation requires rapid neuronal translation

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 281-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0568-z

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [NS034007, NS047384]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Investigator grant
  3. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A chemogenetic approach was developed for cell-type-specific drug-inducible protein synthesis inhibition in mice. It was used to show that consolidation of long-term aversive memories requires rapid neuronal protein synthesis in the amygdala. New protein synthesis is known to be required for the consolidation of memories, yet existing methods of blocking translation lack spatiotemporal precision and cell-type specificity, preventing investigation of cell-specific contributions of protein synthesis. Here we developed a combined knock-in mouse and chemogenetic approach for cell-type-specific drug-inducible protein synthesis inhibition that enables rapid and reversible phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha, leading to inhibition of general translation by 50% in vivo. We use cell-type-specific drug-inducible protein synthesis inhibition to show that targeted protein synthesis inhibition pan-neuronally and in excitatory neurons in the lateral amygdala (LA) impaired long-term memory. This could be recovered with artificial chemogenetic activation of LA neurons, although at the cost of stimulus generalization. Conversely, genetically reducing phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha in excitatory neurons in the LA enhanced memory strength but reduced memory fidelity and behavioral flexibility. Our findings provide evidence for a cell-specific translation program during consolidation of threat memories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available