4.7 Article

Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 176-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0574-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program at the NIDA
  2. Canada Research Chair's program
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Undergraduate Student Research Award
  5. Concordia University Undergraduate Research Award
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [ZIADA000587] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maes et al. use second-order conditioning, blocking and optogenetic inhibition to show that cue-evoked dopamine transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions. Reward-evoked dopamine transients are well established as prediction errors. However, the central tenet of temporal difference accounts-that similar transients evoked by reward-predictive cues also function as errors-remains untested. In the present communication we addressed this by showing that optogenetically shunting dopamine activity at the start of a reward-predicting cue prevents second-order conditioning without affecting blocking. These results indicate that cue-evoked transients function as temporal-difference prediction errors rather than reward predictions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available