4.7 Article

Temporally restricted dopaminergic control of reward-conditioned movements

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 209-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0567-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS100050, NS096994, DA042739, DA005010]
  2. National Science Foundation NeuroNex Award [1707408]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1707408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1707408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons encode both reward- and movement-related events and are implicated in disorders of reward processing as well as movement. Consequently, disentangling the contribution of DA neurons in reinforcing versus generating movements is challenging and has led to lasting controversy. In this study, we dissociated these functions by parametrically varying the timing of optogenetic manipulations in a Pavlovian conditioning task and examining the influence on anticipatory licking before reward delivery. Inhibiting both ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra pars compacta DA neurons in the post-reward period had a significantly greater behavioral effect than inhibition in the pre-reward period of the task. Furthermore, the contribution of DA neurons to behavior decreased linearly as a function of elapsed time after reward. Together, the results indicate a temporally restricted role of DA neurons primarily related to reinforcing stimulus-reward associations and suggest that directly generating movements is a comparatively less important function. In mice that have undergone Pavlovian reward conditioning, dopaminergic neurons regulate conditioned movements in a temporally restricted manner, consistent with a primary contribution to associative learning rather than online movement generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available