4.8 Article

Integrative molecular and clinical modeling of clinical outcomes to PD1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1916-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0654-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  2. Conquer Cancer Foundation
  3. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancers
  4. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  5. BroadNext10
  6. National Institutes of Health [K08 CA234458, R01 CA227388, U01 CA233100, T32 GM008313]
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [SCHA 422/17-1, PA 2376/1-1, HO 6389/2-1 (KFO 337)]
  8. National Science Foundation [DGE1144152]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated efficacy in many tumor types, but predictors of responsiveness to anti-PD1 ICB are incompletely characterized. In this study, we analyzed a clinically annotated cohort of patients with melanoma (n = 144) treated with anti-PD1 ICB, with whole-exome and whole-transcriptome sequencing of pre-treatment tumors. We found that tumor mutational burden as a predictor of response was confounded by melanoma subtype, whereas multiple novel genomic and transcriptomic features predicted selective response, including features associated with MHC-I and MHC-II antigen presentation. Furthermore, previous anti-CTLA4 ICB exposure was associated with different predictors of response compared to tumors that were naive to ICB, suggesting selective immune effects of previous exposure to anti-CTLA4 ICB. Finally, we developed parsimonious models integrating clinical, genomic and transcriptomic features to predict intrinsic resistance to anti-PD1 ICB in individual tumors, with validation in smaller independent cohorts limited by the availability of comprehensive data. Broadly, we present a framework to discover predictive features and build models of ICB therapeutic response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available